Tuesday, January 13, 2009

That's just insensitive

From the Huffington Post. Governor Paterson (D-New York) is being criticized for not being more open about his decision-making process in selecting Hillary Clinton's (D-New York) replacement.
"The law is on his side as far as whether he has to do any this with transparency," said Barbara Bartoletti, legislative director of the League of Women Voters. "But good government is not on his side here."
Isn't it a little mean to criticize a blind guy for his actions not being transparent? How would he even know?

In related news, when did John Travolta become Governor of New York?



In related news, what the hell happened to John Travolta's face? Either he's playing a firefighter in his next movie or my second worst fear has come true and Hulk Hogan has become contagious...

Yikes.

THIS JUST IN: Michael Phelps caught it, too!

He's got...Hulkamania! I need 100cc of "Macho Man" Randy Savage, stat! Oooh, yeah!

Wow, that's too many close up man-faces in a row. Save us, Random Google Baby!

Much better.

Let's see: borderline offensive comment about political official - check; facial hair commentary - check; wrestling reference - check; baby face - check. I think my work here is done.

3 Comments:

Blogger Kyle P. Edmonds, MD said...

Not so fast...I don't see anything about zombies in this post and, without zombies, I see no reason to come back.

5:21 PM  
Blogger Daviticus said...

What's so insensitive about it? They're just treating him like any other politician.

5:49 PM  
Blogger Montgomery said...

The criticism is valid, true enough. But to say his actions aren't "transparent?" They could've picked a better way to phrase it. He's physically unable to see if it's transparent or not. Come on!

6:47 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home